Läbi raskuste tähtede poole: doktoritööde juhendajate kraadiõpingute kogemused ja nende seosed juhendamispraktikaga

Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x

Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2004). Changing postgraduate supervision practice: A programme to encourage learning through reflection and feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000172685

Delamont, S., Parry, O., & Atkinson, P. (1998). Creating a delicate balance: The doctoral supervisor’s dilemmas. Teaching in Higher Eduation, 3(2), 157–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356215980030203

Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 299–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680562

Eamets, R., Tamm, K., Tamm-Klaos, D., Aksen, M., Kärner, A., & Kindsiko, E. (2014). Doktoriõppe tulemuslikkuse analüüs. Uuringu 2.4 lõppraport. Külastatud aadressil http://tips.ut.ee/img/image/TIPSraportdoktorippetulemuslikkusest27.03.141.pdf.

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Eesti ülikoolide kvaliteedi hea tava lepe (2003). Külastatud aadressil http://www.ern. ee/images/dokumendid/kvaliteedilepe/allkirjastastud_head_tavad.pdf.

Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58(1), 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7

Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0081

Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0039

Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1999). Naming the game: Reconstructing graduate supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251990040105

Halse, C. (2011). ’Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593

Hemer, S. R. (2012). Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 827–839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011

Hockey, J. (1994). New territory: Problems of adjusting to the first year of a social science PhD. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 177–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382027

Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisory selection or allocation or continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161

Kam, B. H. (1997). Style and quality in research supervision: The supervisor dependency factor. Higher Education, 34(1), 81–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002946922952

Karm, M., & Remmik, M. (2013). Algajate õppejõudude õpetamisarusaamad fotointervjuude põhjal. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 1, 124–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2013.1.07

Kehm, B. M. (2004). Developing doctoral degrees and qualifications in Europe: Good practice and issues of concern – A comparative analysis. In J. Sadlak (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and prospects (pp. 279–296). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.

Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109550

Kärner, A. (2008). Doctoral supervision: Towards new concepts and dilemmas. In J. Mikk., M. Veisson & P. Luik (Eds.), Reforms and innovations in Estonian education (pp. 61–76). Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.

Lahenius, K. (2012). Communities of practice supporting doctoral studies. The International Journal of Management Education, 10(1), 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.02.003

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202

Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Remmik, M. (ettevalmistamisel). Doktoriõppe katkestajad doktoriõppe protsessist ja katkestamisega seotud teguritest.

Lepp, L., Karm, M., & Remmik, M. (2013a). Supervisors’ activities in supporting PhD students in the supervisory process. In E. Saar & R. Mõttus (Eds.), Higher education at the crossroad: The case of Estonia (pp. 247–265). Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.

Lepp, L., Remmik, M., Karm, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2013b). Supervisors’ conceptions of doctoral studies. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(4), 401–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/tr.2013.4.06

Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Mainard, T., van der Rijst, R., van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor-doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58(3), 359–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8

Manathunga, C. (2005). Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 219–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000337963

Martinsuo, M., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598

Ots, A., Leijen, Ä., & Pedaste, M. (2012). The relationship between doctoral students’ progress in studies and coping with occupational and family responsibilities. In J. Mikk, P. Luik & M. Veisson (Eds.), Lifelong learning and teacher development (pp. 130–145). Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.

Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. S. (2000). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Pole, C. J., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R. G., & Lakin, E. (1997). Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293970220104

Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551

Riigikogu (1995). Ülikooliseadus. Riigi Teataja I 1995, 12, 119. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/28729.

Riigikogu (2011). Teadus- ja arendustegevuse korralduse seaduse muutmise seadus. Riigi Teataja I 16.03.2011, 3. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/116032011003.

Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569

Saarniit, I-I. (2014). Kraadiõppe korraldusest ülikoolis ajalooliselt. M. Remmik. [Helisalvestis, 14.01.2014].

Sambrook, S., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision … a view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 71–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781473

Siilivask, K., & Palamets, H. (1982). Tartu Ülikooli ajalugu III 1918–1982. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat ja Valgus.

Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of ’good’ PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572

Vassil, K., & Solvak, M. (2012). When failing is the only option: Explaining failure to finish PhDs in Estonia. Higher Education, 64(4), 503–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9507-6

Vilkinas, T. (2002). The PhD process: the supervisor as manager. Education + Training, 44(3), 129–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910210424337

Wisker, G. (2001). The postgraduate research handbook: Succeed with Your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD. Basingstoke: Palgrave.